
 
Pollinator Paradise      Parma R & E Center     
PSES      
College of Agriculture       
University of Idaho          
Research slide shows     
Bee management    
Philosophy   
Links   
Contact us

| Materials
      and Methods Table 1: initial % live Table 2: % actual emergence Does sand + pyrethrin work better? Table 3: emergence from sand + pyrethrin | This experiment was conducted at Ron Bitner's suggestion after he read a report from Russia about sand as a method to control chalcid parasites of leafcutting bees. In May, 1997, four gallons of alfalfa leafcutting bee cells containing parasitized cells were divided between five trays, three quarts of cells in each. One tray was left untreated as a control. Cells in two trays were covered with commercial sand used for potting mix. Cells in the remaining two trays were covered with vermiculite. X-ray analysis gave initial estimates of live larvae and parasites. The trays were incubated at 86° F and 50% relative humidity until adult bees no longer emerged from cells, at which point the temperature of the incubator was decreased to 41° F to prevent further parasite emergence. A ¼ cup sample from each of the trays was examined for the proportion of cells showing signs of bee emergence or parasites, or containing dead pupae or dead bees. Cells containing chalkbrood, pollen balls or dead larvae were ignored in this analysis, since they were dead before the experiment started. | 
Table 1: Incubation tray experiment: Live cells vs. parasites in the initial sample:
| %Live Larvae + Live Pupae | %Parasites | 
| 96.1% | 3.9% | 
Of the cells that contained either live bees or parasites, only 4% contained parasites before incubation (Table 1). After incubation, however, 65-70% of the cells showed signs of parasitism in the control tray and vermiculite trays (Table 2). Parasitism was not as high in trays with sand as in controls and vermiculite, but 30-40% parasitism is still very high. In addition, 10-18% of the cells had dead pupae or adults. These were probably stung by a wasp, but the wasp eggs did not develop.
Table 2: Incubation tray experiment: Results after incubation:
| Treatment | %Emerged | %Dead Pupae + Bees | %Parasites | 
| Control | 23% | 11% | 66% | 
| Sand 1 | 60% | 12% | 28% | 
| Sand 2 | 40% | 17% | 43% | 
| Vermiculite 1 | 19% | 10% | 70% | 
| Vermiculite 2 | 17% | 18% | 65% | 
| Top of page Table 1: initial % live Table 2: actual % emergence Does sand + pyrethrin work better? Table 3: emergence from sand + pyrethrin | 
 Parasitism rates for the treated sand were about half the rate for untreated cells, and parasitism for dry sand without pyrethrins was only 5% (Table 3). However, there was substantial mortality of bees in cells that did not emerge, again probably due to unsuccessful parasitism. The dry sand treatment also had a high mortality of bees that died after emergence. We suspect that the dry sand was abrasive, and may have caused the bees to bleed to death as they crawled through the sand. The pyrethrin had no effect. | 
Table 3: Treated Sand experiment: Results after incubation.
| Treatment | %Emerged | %Emerged but died | %Dead in cells | %Parasites | 
| No Treatment | 7% | 3% | 27% | 63% | 
| Dry Sand | 56% | 22% | 17% | 5% | 
| Control (wet sand) | 34% | 6% | 27% | 33% | 
| 0.6875ml* | 44% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 
| 1.375ml* | 47% | 9% | 18% | 26% | 
| 2.75ml* | 46% | 6% | 21% | 27% | 
| 5.5ml* | 51% | 9% | 11% | 30% | 
| 11.0ml* | 51% | 7% | 14% | 28% | 
*ml of formulated 6% pyrethrin per 150 ml of sand.
We conclude that neither the sand that we tested nor vermiculite are useful for controlling chalcid parasites in loose cells.

Top of page   Pollinator Paradise    
Parma R & E Center  
PSES   College of Agriculture   
University of Idaho
Research slide shows     
Bee management    
Philosophy   
Links   
Contact us
